Why peach-flow is a Static HTML Site
peach-flow.ch and peach-flow.com exist.
That statement matters more than how it was built.
YAGNI Is an Execution Strategy
I deliberately chose a simple static HTML site.
Not because it’s elegant.
Not because it’s scalable.
But because nothing more is justified yet.
YAGNI is often treated like a slogan.
Here it’s an execution constraint.
No backend.
No CMS.
No framework debates.
Anything beyond a static page would have been speculation disguised as architecture.
Sacrificial by Design
Early architecture should be sacrificial.
If this code survives long-term, that’s a failure of imagination.
It exists to be thrown away.
This is evolutionary architecture in its most honest form:
- optimize for learning, not longevity
- prefer reversibility over correctness
- accept that today’s solution is tomorrow’s liability
Why AI Generated the Site
I let AI generate the site on purpose.
Not to move faster.
Not to cut corners.
But to learn by doing.
If PEACH-Flow explores motivation, agency, and action, then avoiding AI out of principle would be hypocrisy.
This was an experiment:
- using AI as a collaborator, not a crutch
- observing where it accelerates thinking
- noticing where it creates false confidence
You don’t understand a tool by theorizing about it.
You understand it by using it under real constraints.
Action Beats Architectural Comfort
I could have:
- designed a clean system
- argued for future extensibility
- waited until it felt “right”
Instead, I published a site.
The site is not the achievement.
The decision to stop thinking and start acting is.
This pattern will repeat.
PEACH-Flow will move forward through small, disposable steps.
Anything else would be self-deception.